Building Bulletproof Memory for the Competition Arena: Science-Based Strategies for Dressage Riders

The moment you enter the arena, everything changes. Your horse senses your energy, the judge's eyes are upon you, and suddenly that test you could ride blindfolded at home feels like a foreign language. This phenomenon plagues even the most accomplished dressage riders, where years of training can evaporate under the pressure of competition. The science behind memory under stress reveals why this happens and, more importantly, offers evidence based strategies to build the kind of bulletproof recall that survives even the most intense competitive moments.

Understanding why our carefully rehearsed tests abandon us under pressure begins with recognizing how stress fundamentally alters our brain's memory systems. When we perceive the pressure of competition, acute stress disrupts the delicate balance between the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, impairing memory retrieval by enhancing emotional responses and weakening cognitive control (Schwabe, 2017; Kim & Kim, 2019). The amygdala, our brain's alarm system, becomes hyperactivated during competition stress, dominating neural processing and strengthening its influence over both the hippocampus, which handles memory encoding and retrieval, and the prefrontal cortex, which manages executive control (Schwabe, 2017; Roozendaal et al., 2004). This creates a perfect storm where the very systems we need for precise test execution become compromised when we need them most.

The hippocampus, crucial for spatial memory and sequential learning that dressage tests demand, suffers particularly under competitive stress. Stress impairs synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, reducing its ability to support memory retrieval through the effects of stress hormones like glucocorticoids and the amygdala's modulatory influence (Maroun & Richter-Levin, 2003; Sandi et al., 2005). This can block long-term potentiation, a key process for memory formation and retrieval, in both the hippocampus and its connections with the prefrontal cortex (Kim & Kim, 2019; Roesler et al., 2021). For dressage riders, this translates to forgetting test movements you've practiced hundreds of times, losing track of where you are in the sequence, or blanking on transitions you could execute flawlessly in training.

The prefrontal cortex, responsible for the executive control and working memory that allows us to maintain focus and adapt to our horse's responses, becomes suppressed under acute competition stress. This suppression is exacerbated by increased amygdala activity and stress hormones, leading to reduced cognitive control and impaired working memory (Schwabe, 2017; Sandi et al., 2005; Weerda et al., 2010). The result is what many riders experience as tunnel vision, inability to make real time adjustments, or feeling like they're riding on autopilot without the flexibility to respond to their horse's needs. The brain literally shifts from thoughtful, flexible memory systems to more reflexive, habitual systems, with the amygdala playing a central role in this network reconfiguration (Schwabe, 2017; Roozendaal et al., 2004).

Individual differences significantly influence how susceptible riders are to these stress induced memory disruptions. Genetic variation plays a major role in anxiety and stress related responses, with heritability estimates ranging from 20 to 60 percent for anxiety, inhibited temperament, and related traits (Meier et al., 2019; Purves et al., 2019; Fox et al., 2020). Specific genetic variants in systems like PDE4B, NTRK2, CRHR1, and the serotonin transporter are linked to increased anxiety and stress reactivity, which can heighten vulnerability to memory lapses under competition pressure (Meier et al., 2019; Gottschalk & Domschke, 2016). This means some riders are simply more genetically predisposed to experience memory disruption in high stakes situations, though understanding this can reduce self criticism and inform targeted preparation strategies.

Temperament and baseline anxiety levels also predict susceptibility to competition related memory problems. Inhibited or anxious temperament, often present from childhood and partially heritable, predicts greater risk for stress related memory problems and heightened competition anxiety (Fox et al., 2020; Clauss et al., 2015). These temperamental traits are associated with altered function and connectivity in the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, the very regions most affected by competitive stress (Fox et al., 2015; Kalin, 2017). For riders with naturally higher anxiety, the competition environment creates a more dramatic disruption to memory systems, making preparation strategies even more crucial for competitive success.

The relationship between body awareness and memory stability during competition anxiety reveals another important factor for dressage riders. Interoceptive awareness, our ability to perceive internal bodily signals like heartbeat, breathing, and muscle tension, shapes memory stability during performance anxiety with both protective and disruptive effects depending on interpretation (Kiera et al., 2025; Nord & Garfinkel, 2022). Heightened interoceptive awareness is consistently linked to increased anxiety, especially when bodily signals are interpreted negatively, creating a feedback loop where anxiety heightens bodily awareness, which amplifies anxiety and potentially destabilizes memory during competition (Kiera et al., 2025; Clemente et al., 2024). However, adaptive interoceptive awareness, the ability to notice bodily signals without distraction or worry, predicts better anxiety regulation and improved performance, likely supporting memory stability during competitive stress (Schmalbach & Petrowski, 2025; De Lima-Araujo et al., 2022).

The encouraging news is that repeated exposure to competitive settings can recalibrate stress responses and improve memory resilience through neuroplasticity. Moderate, repeated exposure to challenging performance situations can foster adaptive neuroplastic changes in brain circuits involved in attention, learning, and memory, enhancing resilience to future competitive stress (Cabib et al., 2020; Hermans et al., 2024). This process involves strengthening neural pathways that support effective coping and memory retrieval under pressure, with neuroplasticity mechanisms including synaptic remodeling, neurogenesis, and changes in neurotransmitter systems enabling the brain to adapt to repeated stress (Deppermann et al., 2014; Mattson & Leak, 2024). However, excessive or uncontrollable repeated stress can lead to maladaptive neuroplasticity, emphasizing the importance of structured, manageable exposure to competitive environments rather than overwhelming experiences.

The most scientifically validated strategies for protecting memory under competitive pressure center on retrieval practice and overlearning. Retrieval practice involves actively recalling information through self testing rather than passive review, creating stronger, more resilient memory traces that are less susceptible to stress induced forgetting (Smith et al., 2016; Stern, 2016; Wolf & Kluge, 2017). In controlled studies, individuals who used retrieval practice were protected from the typical memory impairments caused by acute stress, while those who only restudied material were not protected (Smith et al., 2016; Vogel & Schwabe, 2016). For dressage riders, this means actively testing yourself on test sequences without looking at the pattern, mentally rehearsing movements while visualizing the arena, and practicing recall under various conditions rather than simply reading through tests repeatedly.

Overlearning and automatization represent equally powerful strategies for memory protection under competitive stress. Practicing material or routines beyond initial mastery until they become automatic helps shift recall from flexible, stress sensitive memory systems to more automatic, habit based systems that are less disrupted by competition pressure (Vogel & Schwabe, 2016). When movements become truly automatized, they require less cognitive effort to retrieve, making them more robust during high pressure competitive moments. This explains why some riders can execute complex movements flawlessly even when anxious, provided those movements have been practiced to the point of complete automation through countless repetitions in varying contexts.

Mental training techniques offer additional scientifically supported approaches for reducing memory lapses during competition anxiety. Mindfulness training and adaptive working memory training emerge as the most effective mental techniques, with multiple studies showing that mindfulness based programs protect against attentional and memory lapses in high stress settings (Jha et al., 2017; Jha et al., 2015; Mrazek et al., 2013). Mindfulness enhances sustained attention, reduces mind wandering, and improves working memory capacity, which together bolster cognitive resilience under competitive pressure (Jha et al., 2019; Zeidan et al., 2010). Adaptive working memory training, such as dual n back tasks, improves attentional control, reduces anxiety, and enhances memory performance under stress (Sari et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2023; Beloe & Derakshan, 2019).

Practical implementation of these strategies requires a systematic approach to competition preparation. Begin incorporating retrieval practice into your training by regularly testing yourself on test patterns without reference materials, practicing mental rehearsal of sequences while away from the barn, and having someone call out random movements for you to execute. Develop overlearning through deliberate repetition of movements and transitions until they feel effortless, practicing tests in various arena conditions and environments, and continuing to drill movements even after they feel solid. Integrate mindfulness training through regular meditation practice, focused breathing exercises during training, and mindful awareness of body sensations while riding to develop adaptive rather than anxious interoceptive awareness.

Understanding the neuroscience behind competition anxiety and memory disruption transforms how we approach dressage preparation and performance. Rather than viewing memory lapses as personal failures or inadequate training, we can recognize them as predictable neurobiological responses to competitive stress that can be mitigated through evidence based preparation strategies. By building stronger, more resilient memories through retrieval practice and overlearning, developing mindfulness skills for anxiety regulation, and approaching competition exposure in a systematic way, riders can develop the kind of bulletproof recall that allows their years of training to shine through even in the most pressured competitive moments.

For more Neuroscience Equestrian content check out Strides To Solutions Podcast

References

Beloe, P., & Derakshan, N. (2019). Adaptive working memory training can reduce anxiety and depression vulnerability in adolescents. Developmental Science, e12831. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12831

Cabib, S., Campus, P., Conversi, D., Orsini, C., & Puglisi-Allegra, S. (2020). Functional and dysfunctional neuroplasticity in learning to cope with stress. Brain Sciences, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020127

Clauss, J., Avery, S., & Blackford, J. (2015). The nature of individual differences in inhibited temperament and risk for psychiatric disease: A review and meta-analysis. Progress in Neurobiology, 127, 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.03.001

Clemente, R., Murphy, A., & Murphy, J. (2024). The relationship between self-reported interoception and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105923

De Lima-Araujo, G., De Sousa Júnior, G., Mendes, T., Demarzo, M., Farb, N., De Araujo, D., & Sousa, M. (2022). The impact of a brief mindfulness training on interoception: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273864

Deppermann, S., Storchak, H., Fallgatter, A., & Ehlis, A. (2014). Stress-induced neuroplasticity: (Mal)adaptation to adverse life events in patients with PTSD – A critical overview. Neuroscience, 283, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.037

Fox, A., Harris, R., Rosso, L., Raveendran, M., Kamboj, S., Kinnally, E., Capitanio, J., & Rogers, J. (2020). Infant inhibited temperament in primates predicts adult behavior, is heritable, and is associated with anxiety-relevant genetic variation. Molecular Psychiatry, 26, 6609-6618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01156-4

Fox, A., Oler, J., Shackman, A., Shelton, S., Raveendran, M., McKay, D., Converse, A., Alexander, A., Davidson, R., Blangero, J., Rogers, J., & Kalin, N. (2015). Intergenerational neural mediators of early-life anxious temperament. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 9118-9122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508593112

Gottschalk, M., & Domschke, K. (2016). Novel developments in genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of anxiety. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000219

Hermans, E., Hendler, T., & Kalisch, R. (2024). Building resilience: The stress response as a driving force for neuroplasticity and adaptation. Biological Psychiatry, 97, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.016

Jha, A., Denkova, E., Zanesco, A., Witkin, J., Rooks, J., & Rogers, S. (2019). Does mindfulness training help working memory 'work' better? Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.012

Jha, A., Morrison, A., Dainer-Best, J., Parker, S., Rostrup, N., & Stanley, E. (2015). Minds "At Attention": Mindfulness training curbs attentional lapses in military cohorts. PLoS ONE, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116889

Jha, A., Morrison, A., Parker, S., & Stanley, E. (2017). Practice is protective: Mindfulness training promotes cognitive resilience in high-stress cohorts. Mindfulness, 8, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12671-015-0465-9

Kalin, N. (2017). Mechanisms underlying the early risk to develop anxiety and depression: A translational approach. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 27, 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.03.004

Kiera, A., Jonahs, S., Mary, B., Geoffrey, B., & Polly, W. (2025). Experiences of interoception and anxiety in autistic adolescents: A reflexive thematic analysis. Autism, 29, 1585-1596. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251314595

Kim, E., & Kim, J. (2019). Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex and glucocorticoid interactions produce stress-like effects on memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00210

Maroun, M., & Richter-Levin, G. (2003). Exposure to acute stress blocks the induction of long-term potentiation of the amygdala–prefrontal cortex pathway in vivo. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4406-4409. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04406.2003

Mattson, M., & Leak, R. (2024). The hormesis principle of neuroplasticity and neuroprotection. Cell Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2023.12.022

Meier, S., Trontti, K., Purves, K., Als, T., Grove, J., Laine, M., Pedersen, M., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., Bækved-Hansen, M., Sokołowska, E., Mortensen, P., Hougaard, D., Werge, T., Nordentoft, M., Breen, G., Børglum, A., Eley, T., Hovatta, I., Mattheisen, M., & Mors, O. (2019). Genetic variants associated with anxiety and stress-related disorders: A genome-wide association study and mouse-model study. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1119

Mrazek, M., Franklin, M., Phillips, D., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24, 776-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459659

Nord, C., & Garfinkel, S. (2022). Interoceptive pathways to understand and treat mental health conditions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26, 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.004

Purves, K., Coleman, J., Meier, S., Rayner, C., Davis, K., Cheesman, R., Bækvad-Hansen, M., Børglum, A., Cho, S., Deckert, J., Gaspar, H., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., Hettema, J., Hotopf, M., Hougaard, D., Hübel, C., Kan, C., McIntosh, A., Mors, O., Mortensen, P., Nordentoft, M., Werge, T., Nicodemus, K., Mattheisen, M., Breen, G., & Eley, T. (2019). A major role for common genetic variation in anxiety disorders. Molecular Psychiatry, 25, 3292-3303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0559-1

Roesler, R., Parent, M., LaLumiere, R., & McIntyre, C. (2021). Amygdala-hippocampal interactions in synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107490

Roozendaal, B., McReynolds, J., & McGaugh, J. (2004). The basolateral amygdala interacts with the medial prefrontal cortex in regulating glucocorticoid effects on working memory impairment. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1385-1392. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4664-03.2004

Sandi, C., Woodson, J., Haynes, V., Park, C., Touyarot, K., Lopez-Fernandez, M., Venero, C., & Diamond, D. (2005). Acute stress-induced impairment of spatial memory is associated with decreased expression of neural cell adhesion molecule in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 856-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.034

Sari, B., Koster, E., Pourtois, G., & Derakshan, N. (2016). Training working memory to improve attentional control in anxiety: A proof-of-principle study using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 121, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.09.008

Schmalbach, I., & Petrowski, K. (2025). The role of interoceptive awareness in social anxiety disorder – results of an internet-based CBT-manualized therapist delivered group-treatment. BMC Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03013-3

Schwabe, L. (2017). Memory under stress: From single systems to network changes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13478

Smith, A., Floerke, V., & Thomas, A. (2016). Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Science, 354, 1046-1048. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5067

Stern, P. (2016). Protecting memories from stress. Science, 354, 1016. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.354.6315.1016-E

Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Learning and memory under stress: Implications for the classroom. NPJ Science of Learning, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11

Wang, Y., Bian, W., Wei, J., & Hu, S. (2023). Anxiety-reducing effects of working memory training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.045

Weerda, R., Muehlhan, M., Wolf, O., & Thiel, C. (2010). Effects of acute psychosocial stress on working memory related brain activity in men. Human Brain Mapping, 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20945

Wolf, O., & Kluge, A. (2017). Commentary: Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00048

Zeidan, F., Johnson, S., Diamond, B., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: Evidence of brief mental training. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014