The Psychological Architecture of Asynchronous Performance: Why Online Showing Works When Traditional Exposure Fails

There is a particular kind of rider who loves Western Dressage deeply, trains consistently, has built something genuinely meaningful with her horse at home, and still cannot quite bring herself to enter a show. She has reasons, good ones, distance, cost, timing, the horse not being ready, her own skills needing more work. She has been cycling through versions of those reasons for longer than she wants to admit. And if you ask her directly whether fear plays a role, she will probably tell you no, or at least not exactly, or that it used to but she has mostly worked through it. The research would recognize her immediately. The reasons are real, and the fear underneath them is also real, and the competitive structure of traditional equestrian showing has never been particularly well designed to address either one.

Western Dressage, with its roots in classical horsemanship and the traditions of the American West, is built around a philosophy that is worth taking seriously: it is about the horse, the partnership, and the journey. The Western Dressage Association of America has built a national competitive structure around that philosophy, including a recognized online showing program that allows riders to submit tests from their own arenas, evaluated by USEF-licensed judges, with scores that count toward national points programs and year-end recognition. For many riders, this format has been quietly transformative. For others it still reads as a lesser substitute for real competition, a workaround rather than a legitimate path. This article is an argument, grounded in research across six distinct fields of psychology, that the second view is not only wrong but precisely backwards. Online Western Dressage showing is not a concession to people who cannot handle real competition. It is, for a significant portion of the riding population, the structurally superior competitive environment, and understanding why requires going beneath the surface of what showing actually demands of the nervous system.

Traditional approaches to fear in performance contexts rest on a deceptively simple premise: confront the feared situation, survive it, and the fear recalibrates. For many contexts, this is essentially correct. For equestrian sport, it breaks down in ways that are specific, measurable, and largely unacknowledged by the competitive structure that continues to treat in-person showing as the only legitimate form of the discipline.

Here is what actually happens when a rider with significant performance fear forces herself to a traditional show. The nervous system dysregulates in response to the accumulated environmental threat load. The horse, reading physiological signals that the rider cannot consciously suppress, mirrors that dysregulation and becomes reactive. The reactive horse degrades the rider's performance further, which confirms the threat prediction the nervous system has been holding. The judge observes the result. The score reflects it. The rider leaves with her fear not reduced but reinforced, having just generated the most powerful kind of evidence available to a nervous system: direct, first-person, apparently objective confirmation that the predicted disaster was accurate. The exposure did not recalibrate the fear. It deepened it. The competitive structure did not fail her through malice or indifference. It failed her because it was never designed with her nervous system in mind.

This article examines that failure at the systems level: the psychological safety requirements that make learning possible under evaluation, the social comparison dynamics that traditional show environments make inescapable, the unique problem of nervous system transfer between horse and rider, and the identity architecture that needs to be rebuilt quietly before it can be declared publicly. Understanding these systems does not just explain why online Western Dressage showing works. It explains why the traditional alternative so reliably fails for a significant portion of the riding population, and why that failure tends to be interpreted as a personal inadequacy rather than a structural mismatch.

Psychological Safety Is Not Optional for Learning

The concept of psychological safety in performance and learning contexts has been studied extensively across organizational, educational, and clinical settings, and its findings are consistent enough to constitute something close to a principle: people cannot demonstrate or develop genuine skill in evaluative environments where they do not feel safe enough to take risks (Ito et al., 2021; Madsgaard & Svellingen, 2025). Psychological safety is not the absence of challenge or the removal of evaluation. It is the presence of sufficient interpersonal and environmental security that the person can engage fully with the challenge without allocating significant cognitive resources to self-protection.

Research across healthcare teams, software development environments, and simulation-based education consistently shows that higher psychological safety is linked to better technical performance, greater willingness to use mistakes for learning, and more effective engagement with difficult material in high-stakes evaluative settings (Alami et al., 2024; Grailey et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2022). Crucially, the simulation literature is explicit that psychological safety is not about removing the stakes. It is about balancing genuine challenge with a climate where errors are not publicly punished, which is precisely the condition that allows optimal learning in anxiety-provoking situations (Davila-Gonzalez & Martin, 2024). Evaluation without safety tends to redirect cognitive resources from the task toward image management, self-monitoring, and threat response, none of which are compatible with the fine-grained feel and responsiveness that dressage demands.

In traditional show environments, psychological safety is structurally compromised in several simultaneous ways. You are continuously observed, not just during your test but in the warm-up ring, at the trailer, between classes. You are visibly compared with other competitors whose performances and scores are accessible. You are evaluated in real time with no opportunity for revision, no privacy, and no control over when the assessment occurs.

Research directly comparing synchronous and asynchronous performance environments confirms that synchronous settings produce higher perceived pressure and tension, and that this pressure is negatively correlated with performance quality, with the effect most pronounced for anxious learners (Zsifkovits et al., 2025). Asynchronous formats lower that pressure and protect performance precisely because they remove the continuous social visibility that synchronous environments make unavoidable (Zhang et al., 2022; Zsifkovits et al., 2025).

Online Western Dressage showing inverts the traditional architecture with structural precision. The evaluation is real and credentialed, the scores count toward the WDAA national points programs, and the judge's feedback is genuine. What changes is the observation structure. The performance is asynchronous. No one is watching in real time. The rider controls when the test is ridden, in a familiar environment, with her horse already settled. The psychological safety that the traditional environment structurally removes is restored to the level where genuine skill demonstration becomes possible. Research on high-stakes performance consistently identifies this balance, real evaluation within a psychologically safe context, as the optimal condition for both learning and performance (Taylor et al., 2022; Madsgaard & Svellingen, 2025). Online showing does not lower the stakes. It creates the safety conditions without which high stakes reliably produce avoidance rather than growth.

In practice: If your best riding happens at home and your worst riding happens at shows, this is not a coincidence and it is not a character weakness. It is a predictable consequence of the psychological safety differential between those two environments. Online Western Dressage showing allows the judge to see the truth of your training rather than the product of your threat response.

Social Comparison as Performance Poison

The warm-up ring is, from a social psychology standpoint, a real-time social comparison laboratory operating under nearly optimal conditions for producing anxiety rather than motivation. Research on social comparison in competitive physical contexts has established that the outcome of upward comparison, comparing oneself to someone who appears more capable or successful, depends critically on comparison distance and perceived attainability (Diel et al., 2021). When the comparison target is moderately ahead and the gap feels bridgeable, upward comparison can generate effort and motivation. When the gap is large, chronic, or filtered through existing anxiety and negative self-evaluation, the research is clear: upward comparison produces disengagement, reduced participation, and functional avoidance of the threatening comparison rather than approach toward the standard (Nastasi et al., 2022; Diel et al., 2021).

The warm-up ring presents the worst possible version of this dynamic. The rider observing more polished competitors, more settled horses, higher scores posted on the board, is not receiving moderately challenging comparison information that might stimulate improvement. She is receiving a continuous stream of potentially extreme upward comparison in a context where she has no control over the targets, no ability to opt out, and no cognitive bandwidth to process the comparison adaptively because she is simultaneously trying to prepare a complex performance on a reactive animal. Research on social anxiety and social comparison finds that individuals with higher social anxiety tend to engage in more frequent upward social comparisons, and that these comparisons are associated with greater anxiety and perceived inadequacy, which then promote withdrawal from performance contexts rather than engagement with them (Hui et al., 2025). The warm-up ring is not a neutral environment for the anxious rider. It is a social comparison amplifier operating at maximum intensity at exactly the moment when attentional resources are most needed elsewhere.

Upward comparison also undermines intrinsic motivation in ways that compound over time. Research on motivational orientation consistently finds that environments where performance is continuously evaluated relative to visible others, rather than against one's own developing standard, shift motivation from mastery-based to ego-protective, replacing the original love of the discipline with the considerably more fragile and exhausting goal of not looking worse than the rider in the next corner (Palombi et al., 2025). Riders who entered competition because they love the work of building a partnership with a horse find themselves in the warm-up ring primarily motivated by threat avoidance. That substitution is not benign. It is one of the mechanisms through which the traditional show environment gradually erodes the motivation that brought people to Western Dressage in the first place.

Online showing removes the continuous comparison stream entirely. You ride alone in your arena, submit your test, and receive evaluation against the standard of the movements rather than against the visible performance of other competitors. The score reflects the quality of the work itself. Research on mastery goal orientation identifies this kind of evaluation as the most conducive to genuine skill development and sustainable motivation over time (Palombi et al., 2025; Xiang et al., 2026). The competitive structure of online showing does not eliminate competition. It redirects it toward the only target that actually develops a horse and rider: the quality of the work itself, measured against a meaningful external standard rather than against the anxiety-producing performance of others in an unfamiliar warm-up ring.

In practice: If your anxiety in the warm-up ring is significantly higher than your anxiety when schooling alone at home, the differential is not primarily about the judge. It is about the continuous comparison exposure the warm-up ring makes unavoidable. Online showing does not remove the judge. It removes the comparison stream, and that removal is not a trivial logistical convenience. It is the elimination of one of the most reliable performance-degrading mechanisms in competitive sport.

The Horse as Biofeedback Mirror

There is a problem unique to equestrian sport that has no parallel in most other performance disciplines, and it is one that traditional fear recalibration approaches almost entirely fail to address. The anxious rider is not performing alone. She is performing with a highly sensitive, socially attuned partner who reads her physiological state in real time and responds to it, creating a closed feedback loop that the traditional show environment actively amplifies and that no individual-level intervention fully addresses because it is a systems problem, not an individual one.

Research on dyadic physiological synchrony across species and contexts has established that partners' physiological states can become tightly coupled, particularly in high-stakes, high-monitoring, ongoing interactions (Bastos et al., 2025; Smith et al., 2022). When one partner is dysregulated, stress contagion through physiological channels can sustain or amplify the other's arousal rather than reducing it, a pattern described in the research as co-dysregulation rather than co-regulation (Bastos et al., 2025). In anxious dyads, this tight coupling operates at lower arousal thresholds, meaning the dysregulated partner is continuously transmitting threat signals rather than responding only at genuinely high-need moments (Perlman et al., 2022). The receiving partner learns to treat the environment as more threatening than it would otherwise appear, precisely because its primary social partner's physiological signals are consistently communicating danger.

The channels through which rider anxiety transfers to the horse include muscle tension in the seat, legs, and hands, which the horse reads through contact; changes in breathing patterns, which horses are acutely sensitive to; and heart rate variability, which research on interspecies physiological synchrony suggests horses can detect at close range (Merkies et al., 2018). When a rider enters a threatening environment with an already-dysregulated nervous system, the horse does not receive clear, consistent aids. It receives a physiological signal that something in the environment requires heightened vigilance. The horse's arousal increases. The increased arousal produces behaviors, tension in the topline, shortened stride, elevated head carriage, reluctance to move forward, that the rider experiences as resistance or difficulty. That difficulty confirms the nervous system's threat prediction. The rider's arousal escalates further. The horse escalates in response. Research on dyadic arousal loops confirms that this kind of tightly coupled co-dysregulation is most pronounced in ongoing, high-stakes, highly monitored interactions, precisely the conditions that characterize the traditional show warm-up ring and competition arena (Bastos et al., 2025; Smith et al., 2022).

What the research also identifies are the conditions under which this dynamic can be interrupted. Dyadic arousal loops can be reoriented toward regulation rather than threat when the task framing is cooperative rather than evaluatively competitive, when the environment is familiar and predictable, and when one partner uses adaptive emotion regulation that shifts both members of the dyad toward a more challenge-like physiological response rather than a threat-like one (Bastos et al., 2025). Research on collaborative and supportive dyadic interactions finds that when one partner employs stress reappraisal, the cardiovascular profiles of both partners shift toward more adaptive patterns even in subsequent individual performances, suggesting that regulated dyadic interactions have lasting effects beyond the immediate encounter (Bastos et al., 2025). Research on calm, shared attentional focus in familiar environments shows that low-threat synchronization activities can build positive physiological coupling rather than fear-based coupling, strengthening the dyadic bond without the anxiety amplification that high-stakes unfamiliar environments generate (Balconi & Angioletti, 2023).

Online Western Dressage showing in a familiar home environment creates exactly these conditions. Both horse and rider are environmentally regulated. The familiar space supports calm, shared attentional focus. The test can be ridden in a state where genuine communication between horse and rider is possible, and what the judge sees in the submitted video is the real quality of the dyadic relationship, not the degraded product of a mutual dysregulation spiral.

In practice: If your horse consistently goes better at home than at shows, consider instead that your horse is accurately reading your physiological state, and that addressing your own nervous system regulation through a more manageable competitive format may do more for your horse's performance than any amount of forced repetition in high-arousal environments. The horse is not the problem. The feedback loop is.

Identity Loss and the Quiet Work of Rebuilding

For the rider who has stepped away from competition after an injury, a difficult experience, or a long life interruption, the barrier to return is not merely fear of what might happen. It is the more subtle and considerably more disorienting experience of identity discontinuity. Research on identity reconstruction after setback in athletic and performance contexts identifies this as an ongoing, multiphase process rather than a single event, involving emotional processing, skills development, and the gradual re-authoring of one's narrative about who one is and what one is capable of (Radu-Lefebvre et al., 2021; Saylors et al., 2021). Riders who have stepped back describe versions of the same experience: they no longer know whether they are still the person who competed, who trained seriously, who had that particular relationship with that horse. The identity is neither fully present nor fully abandoned. Research on identity after setback describes this as a liminal phase, an experimenting space rather than a fixed state, and it identifies safe, often lower-stakes and asynchronous contexts as the environments that most reliably support gradual identity reconstruction during this period (Saylors et al., 2021; Qi, 2026).

Returning to traditional competition in this state requires publicly reclaiming an identity that has not yet been privately rebuilt. You show up at the venue as someone who competes before you have accumulated the internal evidence that that is still who you are. If the performance goes badly under the conditions most hostile to building corrective evidence, the identity claim feels premature and is not strengthened but weakened. Research on identity reconstruction consistently finds that contexts offering progressive, achievable mastery experiences with genuine external recognition are most effective at supporting the gradual rebuilding of a capable, purposeful self-concept (Dhokai et al., 2023; Causo & Quinlan, 2021). The key mechanism is not a dramatic public declaration of return. It is the accumulation, often in private or semi-private contexts, of evidence that the identity being rebuilt has genuine content.

Research on digital identity work after setback finds that asynchronous or lower-immediacy contexts allow individuals to experiment with self-presentation and competence without real-time scrutiny, supporting gradual identity work that would be destabilized by immediate public evaluation (Fisch & Block, 2021; Saylors et al., 2021). Online Western Dressage showing reverses the sequence of identity reconstruction in a way that is both psychologically sound and practically achievable. You rebuild the identity privately, test by test, in an environment where the experience is real but the exposure is controlled. Each score from a USEF-licensed judge is a piece of external evidence that the identity you are reconstructing has genuine content. Each WDAMA Bronze Medal submission, each set of scores accumulated toward a year-end award, each Rookie of the Year credit earned, these are not just competitive achievements. They are, in the most precise psychological sense, identity documents. They constitute a record of who you are becoming in this discipline, accumulated before that identity needs to be presented publicly.

In practice: You do not need to feel like a competitor before you enter your first online test. You need to enter your first online test in order to begin becoming one. The identity is not a prerequisite for the action. The action, taken in a context safe enough to produce genuine mastery experiences, is the prerequisite for the identity.

When the Body Becomes the Threat Signal

Under repeated pairing of bodily arousal states with threatening experiences, the sensations themselves become conditioned threat signals (Icenhour et al., 2021). The elevated heart rate that precedes a competitive performance, the chest tightening, the heightened alertness, these are normal and even adaptive physiological preparations for a demanding task. But in a rider who has associated those sensations with experiences that went badly, the sensations no longer mean preparation. They mean danger. Research using network analysis found that fear of bodily sensations and monitoring of those sensations sit at the center of networks connecting interoceptive anxiety to avoidance behavior, functioning as amplifiers that take ordinary pre-performance arousal and convert it into threat confirmation (Gessner et al., 2024). The rider notices her heart rate elevating as she approaches the show arena and interprets that signal as evidence that something bad is about to happen, which increases arousal further, which produces more feared sensations, which produce more avoidance motivation.

What the research on interoceptive recalibration shows is that this association is not permanent and is amenable to systematic revision. The brain operates as a predictive system that constantly anticipates bodily demands, compares incoming signals to predictions, and updates its internal models when prediction errors occur (Santamaria-Garcia et al., 2024). Under repeated experiences where bodily arousal is present but the predicted threat does not follow, the coupling between those sensations and the threat prediction gradually loosens. Research on repeated postural threat paradigms found that vestibular and autonomic responses habituated in parallel with emotional arousal over repeated trials, even when the physical context remained constant, supporting the principle that body-threat couplings can recalibrate when the meaning of the arousal is updated rather than confirmed (Santamaria-Garcia et al., 2024).

Arousal reappraisal interventions offer a particularly well-supported model for what this looks like in practice. Research on esport competitors under performance pressure found that arousal reappraisal instructions, teaching performers to view stress arousal as a resource rather than a threat, reduced cognitive anxiety, shifted appraisals from threat to challenge, and improved performance quality (Sharpe et al., 2025). The broader research on interoception and emotion regulation shows that people with greater interoceptive awareness demonstrate more effective downregulation of negative arousal through reappraisal, and that the relationship between physiological and emotional arousal is moderated by beliefs about what that arousal means (Fustos et al., 2013; Pinna & Edwards, 2020). The nervous system can learn that elevated arousal in a performance context is not a warning. It is anticipation. But that learning requires encounters with the arousal in contexts where the feared outcome consistently does not follow, and where cognitive resources are available to encode the new association rather than being consumed by environmental threat management.

Research on interoceptive training further shows that this recalibration is supported when it is embedded in contexts that train accepting, regulated attention to bodily signals rather than fearful monitoring of them (Lazzarelli et al., 2024; Pinna & Edwards, 2020). Online Western Dressage showing in a familiar environment creates precisely these conditions. The arousal is present because the evaluation is real and the performance matters. But the accumulated environmental threat signals of the traditional show are absent, which means the arousal stays within the range where it can be experienced as anticipation rather than catastrophe. Each submission where the arousal was present and the outcome was survivable is a corrective interoceptive experience, gradually building a different relationship between the rider and her own pre-performance signals.

In practice: The chest tightness you feel before submitting an online test is not a warning that something will go wrong. It is the body preparing for something that matters. Online showing lets you encounter that sensation in a context where it is consistently followed by survival and often by good work, until the body's pre-performance signals update their prediction and stop meaning danger.

Cognitive Reappraisal and the Asynchronous Advantage

One of the most consistent findings in equestrian performance psychology is that professional and high-level riders respond to pre-performance arousal differently than novice and anxious riders: experienced riders tend to label the arousal as excitement and use it as performance fuel, while less experienced or more anxious riders label the same arousal as anxiety and it degrades their performance (Wolframm & Meulenbroek, 2012, as cited in Merkies et al., 2018). The crucial point is that this difference is not innate. It is learned through repeated experiences in which arousal was followed by success rather than disaster, gradually teaching the nervous system that heightened activation in a performance context is a resource rather than a threat. Research on arousal reappraisal confirms that these instructions can shift cardiovascular responses from a threat-like to a more challenge-like pattern, reducing attentional bias toward threat cues during stressful performance tasks (Jamieson et al., 2018). The reappraisal is not merely cognitive. It is physiological, and it is trainable through accumulated experience.

The traditional show environment imposes significant extraneous cognitive load on top of arousal, and cognitive load research is clear about what happens when load exceeds capacity: attentional bandwidth narrows, performance degrades, and the rider has fewer resources available for the skilled, responsive communication that Western Dressage specifically demands (Hung et al., 2024; Fan et al., 2023). In a traditional show, extraneous cognitive load includes managing unfamiliar space, monitoring unpredictable warm-up traffic, processing continuous social comparison, managing time pressure, and performing the test itself, all simultaneously. The anxious rider arrives at the test ring already cognitively depleted, with narrowed attentional bandwidth, and then attempts to access the fine-grained feel and communication that Western Dressage requires. The performance reflects the cognitive state, not the training.

Asynchronous online performance removes the extraneous cognitive load while preserving what learning theorists call the germane load, the actual cognitive demands of riding the test well, responding to the horse, executing the pattern, maintaining position and communication. Research on asynchronous performance environments consistently finds that removing time pressure, social evaluation pressure, and environmental unpredictability while maintaining genuine evaluative stakes allows more complete access to trained skills and better encodes the association between arousal and competent performance (Lapitan et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2023). Over repeated online test submissions where arousal was present and performance was good, the nervous system begins to encode the association that professionals already have: elevated arousal in a performance context is compatible with, and perhaps even supportive of, good work. That encoding is not a deliberate act of positive thinking. It is the gradual revision of associative history through accumulated evidence, exactly the kind of learning that produces the most durable changes in how fear and performance interact over time (Craske et al., 2022; Pittig et al., 2022).

In practice: The goal of repeated online test submissions is not just to accumulate points toward the YEHP belt buckle or your medal, though both are genuinely worth pursuing. It is to accumulate a history of arousal followed by competence, until the arousal stops predicting disaster and starts predicting what it actually precedes: a real performance, evaluated honestly, by someone who knows the discipline.

The Structural Solution the Research Converges On

Across psychological safety theory, social comparison research, dyadic physiological synchrony, identity reconstruction after setback, interoceptive recalibration, and cognitive load research, the findings converge on the same architectural conclusion. The traditional show environment is not optimized for fear recalibration. It is optimized for performance demonstration under conditions that assume the performer is already operating from a regulated baseline. When the baseline is not regulated, the environment amplifies the problem across every system simultaneously: it removes psychological safety, floods the rider with maladaptive upward comparison, triggers horse-rider dysregulation loops, requires public identity claims that have no private foundation yet, converts normal arousal into threat signals, and depletes the cognitive resources that skilled performance requires.

Online Western Dressage showing, embedded within the WDAA recognized show structure and supported by the community and progressive recognition architecture of organizations like WDAMA, is a precision intervention for a population whose nervous systems require evaluation without continuous observation, genuine challenge without comparison overload, real feedback without environmental dysregulation, and progressive mastery experiences that rebuild identity quietly before it needs to be claimed publicly. The asynchronous format, the familiar environment, the absence of real-time social comparison, the judge's written feedback rather than the immediate public rendering of a live score, these are not concessions to weakness. They are the specific structural features that the research across six distinct psychological disciplines identifies as necessary conditions for fear recalibration, skill development under anxious conditions, and the gradual reconstruction of a competitive identity after it has been interrupted.

The WDAA recognized show list at wdaa.memberclicks.net is the starting point. Platforms including DressageShowsOnline.com, Spotlight, Janssen Dressage Online, KFOHS, and Thistle Run Equestrian Event all offer WDAA-rated classes accessible from your own arena. The YEHP program at wdaapoints.org, free to join, tracks your scores across the year toward a genuine belt buckle. WDAMA at wdama.org provides the community, the progressive medal structure, the Rookie of the Year recognition, and the annual online ceremony that keeps the nervous system regulated and the identity building through the whole journey. WDAMA accepts all WDAA rated virtual shows. Psychological safety theory, social comparison research, dyadic physiological synchrony, identity reconstruction science, interoceptive recalibration research, and cognitive load theory now say the same thing from six different directions: the fear was always a learning problem, the environment was always the missing variable, and the solution was always a structure designed around how nervous systems actually update rather than how competitive cultures assume they should.

The article gave you the framework. The podcast gives you the full picture, including the psychology of frozen goals, the physiological feedback loop between horse and rider that traditional show environments actively amplify, and the community and award structures that make online Western Dressage showing genuinely meaningful rather than just convenient. Click here when you are ready to hear more.

References

Alami, A., Zahedi, M., & Krancher, O. (2024). The role of psychological safety in promoting software quality in agile teams. Empirical Software Engineering, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10512-1

Balconi, M., & Angioletti, L. (2023). Dyadic inter-brain EEG coherence induced by interoceptive hyperscanning. Scientific Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31494-y

Bastos, M., Braz, D., Porto, A., Da Silva Cordeiro, K., Portella, R., & Granger, D. (2025). Physiological attunement and flourishing: Understanding the influence of relationships on health. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1614379

Brandstatter, V., & Bernecker, K. (2021). Persistence and disengagement in personal goal pursuit. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-110710

Cao, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). Exploring learning outcomes, communication, anxiety, and motivation in learning communities: A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02325-2

Causo, F., & Quinlan, E. (2021). Defeating dragons and demons: Consumers' perspectives on mental health recovery in role-playing games. Australian Psychologist, 56, 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1890983

Craske, M., Treanor, M., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2022). Optimizing exposure therapy with an inhibitory retrieval approach and the OptEx Nexus. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 152, 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104069

Davila-Gonzalez, S., & Martin, S. (2024). Human digital twin in industry 5.0: A holistic approach to worker safety and well-being through advanced AI and emotional analytics. Sensors, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020655

De Saint Andre, S., Heinig, I., Arolt, V., Bartnick, C., Dannlowski, U., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Fydrich, T., Goerigk, S., Hamm, A., Hollandt, M., Hoyer, J., Kircher, T., Koelkebeck, K., Lueken, U., Margraf, J., Neudeck, P., Pauli, P., Richter, J., Rief, W., Schneider, S., Straube, B., Strohle, A., Wittchen, H., & Pittig, A. (2025). Same same but different: Threat expectancy change and fear reduction as readouts of exposure rationales. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 194, 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2025.104856

Dhokai, N., Matto, H., Ihara, E., Tompkins, C., Caswell, S., Cortes, N., Davis, R., Coogan, S., Fauntroy, V., Glass, E., Lee, J., Baraniecki-Zwil, G., & Ambegaonkar, J. (2023). Community arts engagement supports perceptions of personal growth in older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 66, 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101142

Diel, K., Broeker, L., Raab, M., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Motivational and emotional effects of social comparison in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57, 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102048

Fan, O., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4

Fisch, C., & Block, J. (2021). How does entrepreneurial failure change an entrepreneur's digital identity? Evidence from Twitter data. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106015

Furie, K., Park, A., & Wong, S. (2023). Mental health and involuntary retirement from sports post-musculoskeletal injury in adult athletes: A systematic review. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 16, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-023-09830-6

Fustos, J., Gramann, K., Herbert, B., & Pollatos, O. (2013). On the embodiment of emotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss089

Gessner, J., Schulz, J., Melzig, C., & Benke, C. (2024). Role of interoceptive fear and maladaptive attention and behaviors in the escalation of psychopathology: A network analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 53, 524-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2336036

Gong, Z., & Kanai, H. (2025). Effects of appearance modifications on oral presentation anxiety in video conferencing. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15716-z

Grailey, K., Murray, E., Reader, T., & Brett, S. (2021). The presence and potential impact of psychological safety in the healthcare setting: An evidence synthesis. BMC Health Services Research, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06740-6

Hui, X., Li, X., Chen, X., Guo, J., & Liu, J. (2025). The relationship between physical exercise and social anxiety: The mediating role of social comparison and emotion regulation. BMC Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03505-2

Hung, C., Wu, S., Chen, Y., Soong, C., Chiang, C., & Wang, W. (2024). The evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: Student experience, learning outcomes, and cognitive load. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05311-7

Icenhour, A., Petrakova, L., Hazzan, N., Theysohn, N., Merz, C., & Elsenbruch, S. (2021). When gut feelings teach the brain to fear pain: Context-dependent activation of the central fear network in a novel interoceptive conditioning paradigm. NeuroImage, 118229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118229

Ito, A., Sato, K., Yumoto, Y., Sasaki, M., & Ogata, Y. (2021). A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care. Nursing Open, 9, 467-489. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1086

Jamieson, J., Hangen, E., Lee, H., & Yeager, D. (2018). Capitalizing on appraisal processes to improve affective responses to social stress. Emotion Review, 10, 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917693085

Lapitan, L., Tiangco, C., Sumalinog, D., Sabarillo, N., & Diaz, J. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012

Lazzarelli, A., Scafuto, F., Crescentini, C., Matiz, A., Orru, G., Ciacchini, R., Alfi, G., Gemignani, A., & Conversano, C. (2024). Interoceptive ability and emotion regulation in mind-body interventions: An integrative review. Behavioral Sciences, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111107

Lukacik, E., & Bourdage, J. (2024). Does design matter? The (limited) effects of six asynchronous video interview design features on impression management, reactions, and evaluations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12511

Madsgaard, A., & Svellingen, A. (2025). The benefits and boundaries of psychological safety in simulation-based education: An integrative review. BMC Nursing, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03575-y

Martin-Wylie, E., Urmston, E., & Redding, E. (2022). Impact of creative dance on subjective well-being amongst older adults: An arts-informed photo-elicitation study. Arts & Health, 16, 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2022.2156562

Merkies, K., Reid, K., & Diehl, N. (2018). Human emotions detected by horses during a public demonstration. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 23, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.10.007

Nastasi, J., Curry, E., Martinez, R., Arigo, D., & Raiff, B. (2022). Stepping up: An evaluation of social comparison of physical activity during Fitbit challenges. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 7, 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-022-00241-x

Özhan, N., Graf, E., & Garner, M. (2026). Social anxiety in online social interactions: Examining the effects of self and audience images on anxiety, self-awareness and performance evaluations. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 118, 103111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103111

Palombi, T., Chirico, A., Cazzolli, B., Zacchilli, M., Alessandri, G., Filosa, L., Borghi, A., Fini, C., Antoniucci, C., Pistella, J., Alivernini, F., Baiocco, R., & Lucidi, F. (2025). Motivation, psychological needs and physical activity in older adults: A qualitative review. Age and Ageing, 54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf180

Perlman, S., Lunkenheimer, E., Panlilio, C., & Perez-Edgar, K. (2022). Parent-to-child anxiety transmission through dyadic social dynamics: A dynamic developmental model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25, 110-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00391-7

Pinna, T., & Edwards, D. (2020). A systematic review of associations between interoception, vagal tone, and emotional regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792

Pittig, A., Heinig, I., Goerigk, S., Richter, J., Hollandt, M., Lueken, U., Pauli, P., Deckert, J., Kircher, T., Straube, B., Neudeck, P., Koelkebeck, K., Dannlowski, U., Arolt, V., Fydrich, T., Fehm, L., Strohle, A., Totzeck, C., Margraf, J., Schneider, S., Hoyer, J., Rief, W., Craske, M., Hamm, A., & Wittchen, H. (2022). Change of threat expectancy as mechanism of exposure-based psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: Evidence from 8,484 exposure exercises of 605 patients. Clinical Psychological Science, 11, 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221101379

Qi, Q. (2026). Detours are not failures, but foundational experiences: An autoethnography inquiry into a Chinese EAL doctoral student's journey of scholarly identity development in research writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70111

Radu-Lefebvre, M., Lefebvre, V., Crosina, E., & Hytti, U. (2021). Entrepreneurial identity: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, 1550-1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211013795

Santamaria-Garcia, H., Migeot, J., Medel, V., Hazelton, J., Teckentrup, V., Romero-Ortuno, R., Piguet, O., Lawor, B., Northoff, G., & Ibanez, A. (2024). Allostatic interoceptive overload across psychiatric and neurological conditions. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.024

Saylors, R., Lahiri, A., Warnick, B., & Baid, C. (2021). Looking back to venture forward: Exploring idea and identity work in public failure narratives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47, 398-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057027

Sharpe, B., Sharpe, A., Poulos, D., Obine, E., King, R., Birch, P., & Gladwin, T. (2025). Enhancing pressurized esports performance: A pilot study on the combined effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and arousal reappraisal. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 38, 641-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2502792

Smith, C., Jones, E., Charman, T., Clackson, K., Mirza, F., & Wass, S. (2022). Vocalization and physiological hyperarousal in infant-caregiver dyads where the caregiver has elevated anxiety. Development and Psychopathology, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095457942100153x

Taylor, J., Collins, D., & Ashford, M. (2022). Psychological safety in high-performance sport: Contextually applicable? Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.823488

Taylor, S., Eklund, R., & Arthur, C. (2021). Fear of failure in sport, exercise, and physical activity: A scoping review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 500-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.1901299

Xiang, L., Yang, J., Gou, H., & Hu, C. (2026). The dynamic relationship between physical activity and psychological well-being in Chinese older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1736019

Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Liew, J., Zhou, X., & Kogut, A. (2023). Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100510

Zhang, R., Bi, N., & Mercado, T. (2022). Do Zoom meetings really help? A comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous online learning during COVID-19. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12740

Zingmark, M., Ankre, R., & Wall-Reinius, S. (2021). Promoting outdoor recreation among older adults in Sweden: A theoretical and empirical foundation for the development of an intervention. Archives of Public Health, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00762-6

Zsifkovits, M., Amplatz, L., Triebner, N., Utz, J., Kornhuber, J., & Spitzer, P. (2025). Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: Equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning. BMC Medical Education, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07481-4