The Stories We're Not Supposed to Tell: How Athlete Narratives Become Sites of Shame or Liberation

There's a script that elite athletes learn early, often without anyone explicitly teaching it. You talk about training, about sacrifice, about overcoming obstacles through determination. You frame setbacks as temporary challenges on the path to triumph. You present yourself as mentally tough, physically dominant, psychologically resilient. What you don't do—what the script explicitly prohibits—is tell stories that complicate this narrative. Stories about struggling with mental health. About injury that won't heal or identity that won't cohere. About the ways athletic life damages you even as it defines you. These unsanctioned stories exist, of course. Athletes live them constantly. But they're supposed to remain private, unspoken, certainly not shared publicly where they might contaminate the performance mythology that elite sport depends on.

The research on athlete storytelling suggests this enforced narrative constraint isn't just limiting—it's actively harmful, generating shame and isolation while preventing the community belonging that comes from shared, authentic experience (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Åkesdotter et al., 2023; Houltberg et al., 2018; Ronkainen & Ryba, 2019). What athletes actually need, what research demonstrates improves both individual wellbeing and community health, is permission to tell multidimensional stories that include vulnerability, failure, and struggle alongside achievement. Public storytelling that moves beyond performance-only narratives can reduce shame, challenge stigma, and foster belonging in ways that the sanitized success scripts never could.

The dominant performance narrative in elite sport operates as a kind of totalizing framework that structures what athletes can say about their experience (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Åkesdotter et al., 2023; Ronkainen & Ryba, 2019; Papathomas & Lavallee, 2014). This narrative prioritizes success metrics—wins, records, rankings—while suppressing anything that suggests psychological complexity or vulnerability. Athletes whose lived experience deviates from this script face a difficult choice: silence the parts of their story that don't fit, or risk the consequences of narrative resistance. Most choose silence, at least publicly, which leads to what gets called identity foreclosure—the premature commitment to a narrow, exclusively athletic sense of self that leaves little room for other aspects of being human.

The psychological costs of this narrative constraint show up measurably. Athletes pressured into performance-only narratives report higher levels of shame, depression, and anxiety, along with increased self-silencing about struggles or difficulties (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Åkesdotter et al., 2023; Houltberg et al., 2018; Papathomas & Lavallee, 2014). The mechanism seems straightforward enough: when your actual experience includes things the dominant narrative can't accommodate—mental illness, disordered eating, injury that disrupts your sense of self, doubt about whether continued participation is worth the costs—you're left feeling deviant, like your struggles are evidence of personal failure rather than normal responses to genuinely difficult circumstances.

Shame thrives in this environment. It feeds on the gap between the story you're supposed to embody and the reality you're actually living. The athlete experiencing depression while surrounded by rhetoric about mental toughness and resilience doesn't just feel sad—they feel ashamed of being sad, convinced that successful athletes don't struggle this way. The one dealing with injury that won't resolve according to expected timelines feels both physically impaired and psychologically defective, as though their failure to follow the comeback narrative reveals some fundamental inadequacy. Shame compounds the original difficulty, making it harder to seek help or acknowledge struggle even to oneself.

What makes narrative medicine approaches promising is how they explicitly work against these shame-generating dynamics. Narrative medicine encourages athletes to share stories that include vulnerability, adversity, and personal growth—the messy, multidimensional reality of athletic life rather than just its triumphant highlights (Åkesdotter et al., 2023; Barker-Ruchti et al., 2019; Carless & Douglas, 2012; Kühnle, 2020). These authentic stories open space for empathy and support that the performance narrative actively forecloses. When athletes hear others articulate struggles similar to their own, shame loses some of its power. The experience that felt isolating and evidence of personal failure gets recontextualized as shared, normal, worthy of compassion rather than judgment.

The research distinguishes between different narrative identities athletes can adopt, and the differences matter for psychological outcomes. Athletes with purpose-based or relational narrative identities—who derive meaning and self-worth from connection, personal growth, and values beyond just winning—experience significantly lower levels of shame, depression, and anxiety compared to those whose identities center exclusively on performance outcomes (Houltberg et al., 2018; Parrott, 2023; Bissell et al., 2024). This isn't about abandoning achievement but about expanding the narrative resources available for making sense of athletic experience. The athlete who can tell stories about what sport means to them beyond medals, who can articulate purpose that persists through setbacks, has psychological flexibility that performance-only narratives don't provide.

Public storytelling particularly matters because its effects extend beyond individual athletes to shape community norms. When prominent athletes share authentic narratives that include mental health struggles, injury experiences that didn't follow triumphant comeback scripts, or identity questions about life beyond sport, they challenge the stigma that keeps others silent (Parrott, 2023; Bissell et al., 2024; Miller et al., 2023). This modeling function shouldn't be underestimated—athletes who would never have considered speaking openly about depression or anxiety become able to do so when they see others doing it without losing legitimacy or respect. The expanded narrative possibilities benefit everyone observing, not just the storyteller.

There's something almost subversive about athletes claiming the right to tell multidimensional stories in contexts that demand narrative simplicity. The performance culture wants clean arcs: struggle, determination, triumph. It wants athletes to be inspiration rather than complicated humans. Public storytelling that refuses these constraints—that insists on vulnerability, that acknowledges ongoing struggle without redemptive closure, that presents athletic identity as one aspect of self rather than its totality—operates as form of narrative resistance (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Åkesdotter et al., 2023; English, 2020). And that resistance creates space for others to resist as well, gradually expanding what counts as tellable within athletic communities.

The research on community belonging shows that diverse, authentic stories foster shared experience and connection in ways that monolithic performance narratives cannot (Ronkainen & Ryba, 2019; Barker-Ruchti et al., 2019; Carless & Douglas, 2012; Miller et al., 2023). Athletes who share struggles find others who've experienced similar difficulties. The isolation that intensifies psychological distress starts dissolving as people recognize their experiences aren't aberrant or evidence of individual failure but part of broader patterns. This sense of shared struggle, of not being alone in difficulty, is foundational for community belonging. You can't feel you belong to a community that only values your achievements while requiring you to hide everything else about your experience.

Storytelling interventions and online platforms have begun creating structured opportunities for this kind of authentic narrative sharing, with promising results for both individual wellbeing and community cohesion (Miller et al., 2023; Bissell et al., 2024; Carless & Douglas, 2012). These spaces allow athletes to tell stories they couldn't share in more traditional athletic contexts, to receive support and validation for experiences that dominant narratives would pathologize. The interventions work partly by expanding narrative resources—giving athletes alternative frameworks for understanding their experiences beyond the performance script—and partly by creating communities organized around authenticity rather than achievement.

But the process isn't uniformly simple or safe. Some research cautions that not all stories are equally "tellable" in every context, especially for marginalized athletes who face additional constraints on what they can publicly acknowledge (English, 2020; McGannon et al., 2023; Everard et al., 2022). The female athlete discussing pregnancy and motherhood navigates different narrative terrain than male athletes, facing judgment about commitment and professionalism that men don't encounter. Athletes from minoritized racial or ethnic groups may face responses to vulnerability that differ from what white athletes experience. The intersection of athletic identity with other marginalized identities can make authentic storytelling riskier, potentially subjecting athletes to intensified scrutiny or stereotyping.

This means that while authentic storytelling generally benefits athletes and communities, the benefits aren't equally accessible to everyone. Creating genuinely safe spaces for narrative sharing requires attending to power dynamics and intersecting marginalities that shape whose stories get heard, believed, and validated. The white male elite athlete discussing mental health struggles faces real stigma and risk, but likely less than the Black female athlete discussing the same issues while navigating racialized and gendered assumptions about emotional stability and professional commitment.

Media framing matters tremendously for how athlete vulnerability narratives get received and what effects they have on broader communities. When media covers athlete mental health disclosures respectfully, contextualizing them within systemic pressures rather than treating them as individual pathology, the stories can reduce stigma and encourage help-seeking (Parrott, 2023; Bissell et al., 2024; Hapig et al., 2024). But when media sensationalizes or uses vulnerability to question athletic capability, it reinforces exactly the stigma that authentic storytelling is meant to challenge. Athletes reasonably fear that sharing authentic stories will result in media coverage that harms rather than helps, and those fears aren't paranoid—they're often accurate assessments of how vulnerability gets weaponized.

The long-term effects of narrative medicine interventions remain somewhat unclear, partly because most research has focused on immediate or short-term outcomes. We know that authentic storytelling in the moment reduces shame and increases belonging, but whether these benefits persist, whether they fundamentally shift team cultures or just create temporary relief, deserves more sustained investigation. There's also complexity around how repeatedly telling difficult stories affects the storyteller—does it promote continued processing and growth, or does it risk retraumatization or identity over-investment in struggle narratives?

What the research makes abundantly clear is that the performance-only narrative isn't serving athletes or communities well. It generates shame, enforces isolation, prevents help-seeking, and forecloses identity development beyond narrow athletic achievement (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Åkesdotter et al., 2023; Houltberg et al., 2018). The alternative—public, authentic storytelling that embraces multidimensional identity and normalizes vulnerability—consistently correlates with better psychological outcomes and stronger community belonging (Carless & Douglas, 2013; Houltberg et al., 2018; Parrott, 2023; Bissell et al., 2024; Miller et al., 2023). This shouldn't be surprising. Humans are complicated, athletic experiences are difficult, and pretending otherwise helps no one except those invested in maintaining mythology over reality.

Perhaps what needs shifting is the basic assumption that athletic excellence requires narrative simplicity, that champions must present as invulnerable to maintain legitimacy. The evidence suggests the opposite—athletes who can tell authentic, multidimensional stories about their experiences show greater psychological resilience and wellbeing, not less. The vulnerability we've been treating as weakness might actually be the foundation for genuine strength, the kind that persists beyond competitive careers because it's rooted in authentic self-knowledge rather than performance mythology.

The stories athletes aren't supposed to tell—about struggle, vulnerability, identity complexity, the costs of excellence—are exactly the stories that need telling. Not just for individual catharsis, though that matters, but for collective liberation from narrative constraints that harm everyone they supposedly protect. Whether athletic communities are willing to make space for these stories, to value authentic complexity over performance simplicity, remains an open question. But the research makes clear what's at stake: continued shame and isolation under dominant narratives, or the possibility of genuine belonging through shared, authentic storytelling.

References

Åkesdotter, C., Kenttä, G., & Sparkes, A. C. (2023). Elite athletes seeking psychiatric treatment: Stigma, impression management strategies, and the dangers of the performance narrative. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 36(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2023.2185697

Barker-Ruchti, N., Schubring, A., Post, A., & Pettersson, S. (2019). An elite athlete's storying of injuries and non-qualification for an Olympic Games: A socio-narratological case study. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(5), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1605405

Bissell, K. L., Chou, W. S., & Dirks, E. A. (2024). Elite but struggling: Mediated narratives of women athletes and mental health disclosures. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 26(1), 4–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/15226379231222732

Carless, D., & Douglas, K. (2012). Stories of success: Cultural narratives and personal stories of elite and professional athletes. Reflective Practice, 13(3), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.657793

Carless, D., & Douglas, K. (2013). Living, resisting, and playing the part of athlete: Narrative tensions in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.05.003

English, C. (2020). Elite women athletes and feminist narrative in sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 14(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1767185

Everard, C. M., Wadey, R., & Howells, K. (2022). Sharing and discussing sports injury narratives with elite athletes: Reflecting on member reflections. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2022.2152083

Hapig, M., Zurstiege, G., Mayer, J., Thiel, A., & John, J. M. (2024). Exploring print media coverage of elite athletes' mental illness between 2010 and 2023 in Germany: A quantitative content analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, Article 1446680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1446680

Houltberg, B. J., Wang, K. T., Qi, W., & Nelson, C. (2018). Self-narrative profiles of elite athletes and comparisons on psychological well-being. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(3), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2018.1481919

Kühnle, F. (2020). Sad stories for a better future: Narratives and functions of depression stories in elite athletes' autobiographies. European Journal for Sport and Society, 17(3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2020.1792074

McGannon, K. R., Graper, S. L., & McMahon, J. (2021). Skating through pregnancy and motherhood: A narrative analysis of digital stories of elite figure skating expectant mothers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57, Article 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102126

McGannon, K. R., Kulkarni, S., Hladun, W., Bundon, A., & Pegoraro, A. (2023). Exposing a motherhood penalty in sport: A feminist narrative inquiry of media stories of Canadian athlete mothers' journeys to the 2020 Tokyo Games. Communication & Sport, 13(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231187916

Miller, T. W., Coates, J. E., Plateau, C. R., & Barker, J. B. (2023). Exploring the barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking behaviours in British elite track and field athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 36(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2023.2197962

Papathomas, A., & Lavallee, D. (2014). Self-starvation and the performance narrative in competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(6), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.10.014

Parrott, S. (2023). "This isn't a sports story . . . this is a life story": Elite athletes and myths about mental illness in sport. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(4), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0075

Ronkainen, N. J., & Ryba, T. V. (2019). Developing narrative identities in youth pre-elite sport: Bridging the present and the future. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 12(4), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1642238