Understanding Adrenaline's Impact on Memory Under Pressure

When Your Mind Goes Blank: Understanding Adrenaline's Impact on Memory Under Pressure

Picture this: You've rehearsed your presentation dozens of times, know every word by heart, yet when you step in front of that boardroom, your mind suddenly empties. Or perhaps you're a seasoned musician who can play a complex piece flawlessly at home, but during the recital, your fingers freeze on the keys. These moments of "blanking out" aren't character flaws or signs of inadequate preparation but rather predictable neurobiological responses to stress. They're the result of complex neurochemical processes that occur when adrenaline floods our system under pressure, disrupting the very memory systems we need most during performance.

The neurobiological reality is that adrenaline surges create a cascade of changes throughout our nervous system that can interfere with memory retrieval. When we perceive stress or pressure, adrenaline activates adrenergic and noradrenergic neurons in the brainstem, which then coordinate our body's endocrine and autonomic responses to maintain homeostasis (Pace & Myers, 2023). This isn't just about feeling jittery or having a racing heart but involves fundamental changes in brain function. These stress hormones, including adrenaline, noradrenaline, and glucocorticoids, rapidly affect synaptic function and plasticity, which are the key processes underlying learning and memory (Brosens et al., 2023).

What's particularly fascinating from a psychological perspective is how this process affects different brain regions critical for performance. Adrenaline and related stress hormones modulate activity in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala, which are crucial for memory, attention, and emotional regulation (Brosens et al., 2023). The prefrontal cortex, our brain's executive control center, becomes less effective under high stress, leading to lapses in recall or performance despite adequate preparation. It's like having the filing system in your brain suddenly become inaccessible, even though all the information is still stored there waiting to be retrieved.

The mechanism behind "blanking out" involves the disruption of neural networks called engram cell ensembles that store and retrieve memories. These stress hormones can interfere with the normal function of these memory networks, making it difficult to access well learned information or routines (Brosens et al., 2023). Think of it as temporary interference with your brain's retrieval system where the memories aren't gone but simply harder to access under pressure. The stress response can also bias memory retrieval toward emotional or fear related memories, further interfering with access to neutral or learned information needed for performance (Brosens et al., 2023).

Understanding when stress helps versus hinders memory reveals why some people thrive under pressure while others struggle. Acute, moderate stress can enhance attention and memory for high priority or emotionally salient information, especially if the stressor is directly related to the task at hand (Thomas & Wulff, 2023; Schwabe et al., 2012; Henckens et al., 2009). This explains why some performers seem to rise to the occasion, accessing heightened focus and recall during challenging moments. However, high or prolonged stress impairs memory retrieval, working memory, and attention, especially for complex or flexible thinking (Schwabe et al., 2022; Quaedflieg & Schwabe, 2018; Olver et al., 2015; Vogel & Schwabe, 2016; Shields et al., 2017; Geissler et al., 2022; Wolf, 2017; Schwabe, 2024; Liu et al., 2020; Wirkner et al., 2019).

The timing of stress relative to memory processes makes a crucial difference in performance outcomes. Stress occurring just before or during retrieval, such as before an exam or performance, consistently impairs memory recall, leading to the dreaded "blanking out" experience (Vogel & Schwabe, 2016; Shields et al., 2017; Wolf, 2017). This is exactly what happens during presentations or performances when the stress response is activated at precisely the moment we need optimal recall. The research shows that stress before retrieval disrupts access to previously learned information, creating a neurochemical environment that works against memory retrieval when we need it most.

Interestingly, the type of memory and performance involved can influence how susceptible we are to this stress induced blanking. Speech and music performance rely on distinct brain systems, which explains why someone might forget a speech but play a violin piece flawlessly, or vice versa (Sammler, 2020; Shan et al., 2024). Speech relies more on the left auditory cortex and language networks, while music engages the right auditory cortex and specialized musical networks. This hemispheric specialization means that stress may disrupt one system more than the other, leading to selective performance failures that can seem puzzling to both performer and audience.

The type of memory system engaged also determines vulnerability to stress related interference. Speech performance often depends on working memory, linguistic processing, and semantic recall, which are highly sensitive to stress and distraction (Sharma et al., 2025; Yoo & Bidelman, 2019). Music performance, especially for well practiced pieces, can become highly automated, relying on procedural memory and motor systems that are more resilient to stress if the piece has become truly automatic. This explains why a musician might stumble over words in their introduction but play their piece beautifully, or

conversely, speak eloquently but struggle with a less familiar musical passage.

The research reveals that stress can fragment memory, making individual details vivid but reducing the ability to recall associations or context that are crucial for smooth performance (Grob et al., 2023). This fragmentation helps explain why performers might remember isolated facts or musical phrases but struggle to connect them into a coherent whole under pressure. The brain's shift under stress from flexible, hippocampus dependent retrieval to more rigid, habit based memory can favor well practiced routines over flexible recall (Schwabe, 2023; Vogel & Schwabe, 2016). Understanding this shift can help performers develop strategies that work with rather than against their stress response.

From a therapeutic perspective, understanding these mechanisms can reduce the shame and self criticism that often follow performance anxiety episodes. When we recognize that blanking out is a normal neurobiological response rather than a personal failure, we can approach these experiences with greater self compassion and practical preparation strategies. The research also suggests that chronic stress or repeated exposure to performance anxiety can lead to broader cognitive deficits, including impaired attention control and memory integration (Liu et al., 2020; Wirkner et al., 2019; McEwen & Sapolsky, 1995; Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2018).

The key insight from this research is that blanking out under pressure represents a predictable neurobiological response that affects even the most prepared and competent individuals. By understanding how adrenaline and stress hormones disrupt the neural networks responsible for memory retrieval, we can develop more effective strategies for managing performance anxiety. Rather than viewing these moments as failures, we can recognize them as opportunities to better understand our nervous system and develop more resilience in high pressure situations through targeted preparation and self compassion.

References

Brosens, N., Lesuis, S., Rao-Ruiz, P., Oever, M., & Krugers, H. (2023). Shaping memories via stress: A synaptic engram perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 95, 721-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.008

Dillon, D., & Pizzagalli, D. (2018). Mechanisms of memory disruption in depression. Trends in Neurosciences, 41, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.12.006

Geissler, C., Friehs, M., Frings, C., & Domes, G. (2022). Time-dependent effects of acute stress on working memory performance: A systematic review and hypothesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105998

Grob, A., Ehlers, D., & Schwabe, L. (2023). Strong but fragmented memory of a stressful episode. eNeuro, 10. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0178-23.2023

Henckens, M., Hermans, E., Pu, Z., Joëls, M., & Fernández, G. (2009). Stressed memories: How acute stress affects memory formation in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10111-10119. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1184-09.2009

Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Leng, X., Han, J., Xia, F., & Chen, H. (2020). Impact of chronic stress on attention control: Evidence from behavioral and event-related potential analyses. Neuroscience Bulletin, 36, 1395-1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00549-9

McEwen, B., & Sapolsky, R. (1995). Stress and cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-X

Olver, J., Pinney, M., Maruff, P., & Norman, T. (2015). Impairments of spatial working memory and attention following acute psychosocial stress. Stress and Health, 31, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2533

Pace, S., & Myers, B. (2023). Hindbrain adrenergic/noradrenergic control of integrated endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqad178

Quaedflieg, C., & Schwabe, L. (2018). Memory dynamics under stress. Memory, 26, 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1338299

Sammler, D. (2020). Splitting speech and music. Science, 367, 974-976. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7913

Schwabe, L. (2023). Stress and the control of remembering: Balancing hippocampal and striatal forms of memory retrieval. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101295

Schwabe, L. (2024). Memory under stress: From adaptation to disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 97, 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.005

Schwabe, L., Hermans, E., Joëls, M., & Roozendaal, B. (2022). Mechanisms of memory under stress. Neuron, 110, 1450-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.020

Schwabe, L., Joëls, M., Roozendaal, B., Wolf, O., & Oitzl, M. (2012). Stress effects on memory: An update and integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1740-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.002

Shan, T., Cappelloni, M., & Maddox, R. (2024). Subcortical responses to music and speech are alike while cortical responses diverge. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50438-0

Sharma, Y., Mali, H., Chauhan, D., & Nisha, K. (2025). The impact of musical competence on working memory and speech-in-noise performance. Auditory and Vestibular Research. https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v34i3.18467

Shields, G., Sazma, M., McCullough, A., & Yonelinas, A. (2017). The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 636-675. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000100

Thomas, A., & Wulff, A. (2023). What the acute stress response suggests about memory. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12664

Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Learning and memory under stress: Implications for the classroom. NPJ Science of Learning, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11

Wirkner, J., Ventura-Bort, C., Schwabe, L., Hamm, A., & Weymar, M. (2019). Chronic stress and emotion: Differential effects on attentional processing and recognition memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 107, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.008

Wolf, O. (2017). Stress and memory retrieval: Mechanisms and consequences. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.12.001

Yoo, J., & Bidelman, G. (2019). Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception. Hearing Research, 377, 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.021